Back to Value Frontier

Tencent: Hy3 vs Mistral: Mistral Small 4

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 7:15:37 PM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating Tencent: Hy3 against Mistral: Mistral Small 4, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. Tencent: Hy3 is approximately 4% more cost-effective per 1 million tokens overall.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, Mistral: Mistral Small 4 leads with a statistical ELO score of 1438. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer Mistral: Mistral Small 4, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
Tencent: Hy3
Mistral: Mistral Small 4
Performance (ELO)
1438
1438
Input Cost / 1M
$0.14
$0.15
Output Cost / 1M
$0.58
$0.60
Context Window
262,144 tokens
262,144 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, Tie is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, Tencent: Hy3 wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is Tencent: Hy3 cheaper than Mistral: Mistral Small 4?

Yes. Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper for both input and output generation compared to Mistral: Mistral Small 4. Exploring alternatives often yields cost reductions.

Which model has the larger context window?

Both models offer an identical context window of 262,144 tokens.

Related Comparisons

Compare Tencent: Hy3 vs Cohere: North Mini Code (free)Compare Tencent: Hy3 vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Compare Tencent: Hy3 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B (free)Compare Tencent: Hy3 vs Google: Lyria 3 Pro Preview