Back to Value Frontier

OpenAI: o3 vs OpenAI: GPT-4.1

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 2:52:53 PM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating OpenAI: o3 against OpenAI: GPT-4.1, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. Both models are remarkably similar in API costs.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-4.1 leads with a statistical ELO score of 1415. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-4.1, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
OpenAI: o3
OpenAI: GPT-4.1
Performance (ELO)
1415
1415
Input Cost / 1M
$2.00
$2.00
Output Cost / 1M
$8.00
$8.00
Context Window
200,000 tokens
1,047,576 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, Tie is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, Tie wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is OpenAI: o3 cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-4.1?

No. OpenAI: GPT-4.1 is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

The OpenAI: GPT-4.1 model has the advantage in memory, offering a massive 1,047,576 token limit for document ingestion.

Related Comparisons

Compare OpenAI: o3 vs Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct (free)Compare OpenAI: o3 vs Sao10K: Llama 3 8B LunarisCompare OpenAI: o3 vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare OpenAI: o3 vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano