OpenAI: o3 vs OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)
Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 2:31:54 PM.
Executive Summary
When evaluating OpenAI: o3 against OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613), the pricing structure is a key differentiator. OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is approximately 70% more cost-effective per 1 million tokens overall.
However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) leads with a statistical ELO score of 1431. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613), provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.
You are losing 70%
per million tokens by hardcoding OpenAI: o3.
Stop guessing exactly which model to route to. Deploy the 0ms Intelligence Engine to automatically arbitrage this 70% gap in your production environment instantly.
Raw Technical comparison
Verdict
If you are looking for pure performance and capability, Tie is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) wins out aggressively in pricing.
People Also Ask
Is OpenAI: o3 cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)?
No. OpenAI: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.
Which model has the larger context window?
The OpenAI: o3 model has the advantage in memory, offering a massive 200,000 token limit for document ingestion.