Back to Value Frontier

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 9:49:55 AM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex against OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex is approximately 92% more cost-effective per 1 million tokens overall.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads with a statistical ELO score of 1410. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Arbitrage Alert

You are losing 92%
per million tokens by hardcoding OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro.

Stop guessing exactly which model to route to. Deploy the 0ms Intelligence Engine to automatically arbitrage this 92% gap in your production environment instantly.

92% Instant Profit Margin Recovery
Node.js Enterprise SDK included

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro
Performance (ELO)
1410
1300
Input Cost / 1M
$1.75
$21.00
Output Cost / 1M
$14.00
$168.00
Context Window
400,000 tokens
400,000 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro?

Yes. OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex is cheaper for both input and output generation compared to OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Pro. Exploring alternatives often yields cost reductions.

Which model has the larger context window?

Both models offer an identical context window of 400,000 tokens.

Related Comparisons

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs xAI: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs xAI: Grok 4.20 BetaCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs OpenAI: GPT-5.1 Chat