Back to Value Frontier

OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 9:51:21 AM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex against OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. Both models are remarkably similar in API costs.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex leads with a statistical ELO score of 1410. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat
Performance (ELO)
1410
1390
Input Cost / 1M
$1.75
$1.75
Output Cost / 1M
$14.00
$14.00
Context Window
400,000 tokens
128,000 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, Tie wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat?

No. OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

The OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex model has the advantage in memory, offering a massive 400,000 token limit for document ingestion.

Related Comparisons

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs xAI: Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs xAI: Grok 4.20 BetaCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex vs OpenAI: GPT-5.1 Chat