Back to Value Frontier

OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs OpenAI: GPT-5.2

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 9:52:12 AM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat against OpenAI: GPT-5.2, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. Both models are remarkably similar in API costs.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat leads with a statistical ELO score of 1390. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat
OpenAI: GPT-5.2
Performance (ELO)
1390
1300
Input Cost / 1M
$1.75
$1.75
Output Cost / 1M
$14.00
$14.00
Context Window
128,000 tokens
400,000 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, Tie wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-5.2?

No. OpenAI: GPT-5.2 is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

The OpenAI: GPT-5.2 model has the advantage in memory, offering a massive 400,000 token limit for document ingestion.

Related Comparisons

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct (free)Compare OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Sao10K: Llama 3 8B LunarisCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteCompare OpenAI: GPT-5.2 Chat vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano