Back to Value Frontier

OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo vs OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106)

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 3:23:22 PM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo against OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106), the pricing structure is a key differentiator. Both models are remarkably similar in API costs.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo leads with a statistical ELO score of 1253. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106)
Performance (ELO)
1253
1242
Input Cost / 1M
$10.00
$10.00
Output Cost / 1M
$30.00
$30.00
Context Window
128,000 tokens
128,000 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, Tie wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo cheaper than OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106)?

No. OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo (older v1106) is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

Both models offer an identical context window of 128,000 tokens.

Related Comparisons

Compare OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo vs Google: Gemma 3n 2B (free)Compare OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo vs Google: Gemma 3n 4B (free)Compare OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo vs Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)Compare OpenAI: GPT-4 Turbo vs Nous: Hermes 3 405B Instruct (free)