Back to Value Frontier

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs xAI: Grok Latest

Head-to-head API cost, context, and performance comparison. Synced at 2:04:41 PM.

Executive Summary

When evaluating Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 against xAI: Grok Latest, the pricing structure is a key differentiator. xAI: Grok Latest is approximately 11% more cost-effective per 1 million tokens overall.

However, when looking at raw reasoning capabilities, xAI: Grok Latest leads with a statistical ELO score of 1457. For tasks involving complex logic, coding, or instruction-following, developers might prefer xAI: Grok Latest, provided their budget allows for the API burn rate.

Arbitrage Alert

You are losing 11%
per million tokens by hardcoding Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5.

Stop guessing exactly which model to route to. Deploy the 0ms Intelligence Engine to automatically arbitrage this 11% gap in your production environment instantly.

11% Instant Profit Margin Recovery
Node.js Enterprise SDK included

Raw Technical comparison

Metric
Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
xAI: Grok Latest
Performance (ELO)
1457
1457
Input Cost / 1M
$1.50
$2.00
Output Cost / 1M
$7.50
$6.00
Context Window
262,144 tokens
500,000 tokens

Verdict

If you are looking for pure performance and capability, Tie is statistically superior. However, if API burn rate is the primary concern, xAI: Grok Latest wins out aggressively in pricing.

People Also Ask

Is Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 cheaper than xAI: Grok Latest?

No. xAI: Grok Latest is the more cost-effective model, operating at a lower price point per 1 million tokens.

Which model has the larger context window?

The xAI: Grok Latest model has the advantage in memory, offering a massive 500,000 token limit for document ingestion.

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Ling-3.0-flash (free)Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Cohere: North Mini Code (free)Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Nano Omni (free)Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B (free)